1st Ward Report

I was proud to be voted Best Alderman and selected as Best Alderman to turn up at a rock show in last week’s Chicago Reader. I am even prouder of our institutions and neighborhoods of the 1st Ward that dominated the Readers’ Best Of Issue! 

- Best Neighborhood for Nightlife: Wicker Park

- Best Overall Neighborhood: Logan Square

- Best Neighborhood for Affordability: Logan Square

- Best Street: Milwaukee Avenue

- Best Park for Pickup Basketball Games: Wicker Park

- Best Bowling Alley: Diversey River Bowl

- Best Place to Get Rare Vinyl and a High Score on Burgertime: Logan Hardware

- Best Bike Shop: The Bike Lane

- Best Bookstore: Myopic

- Best Garden Store: Sprout Home

- Best Bang For Your Buck (food)- Big Star

- Best Cocktail List: Violet Hour

- Best Cocktail: Juliet and Romeo (Violet Hour)

- Best Farmer’s Market: Logan Square Farmers Market (winter location)

- Best Restaurant for a Cheap Date: Big Star

- Best Coffee Ship that is nothing like a Coffee Shop: Caffe Streets

- Best Falafel: Sultan’s Market

- Best Pierogi: Kasia’s Deli

- Best Middle Eastern Restaurant: Sultan’s Market

- Best Sandwich: Jerry’s

- Best Taqueria: Big Star

- Best Burlesque Troupe: Gorilla Tango

- Best Art Sale: Renegade Craft Fair

- Best Literary Event: Myopic Poetry Series

- Best Rock Club: Empty Bottle

- Best Nightlife Blogger: Do312

MEDIA ADVISORY

Emergency Effort to Counter Land and Lakes Initiative

SPRINGFIELD – May 29, 2012 - Working together for “Latino environmental justice,” members of the Chicago and State Latino Caucuses will meet in Springfield on Tuesday in an effort to stop a new landfill proposed for Chicago’s southeast side. A press conference will be held at 11:15am on the first floor of the Capital Building to talk about the landfill’s impact on the Latino community and the environmental.

On Tuesday the Environmental Health Committee State House will consider legislation, HB388, a bill that will prohibit any new landfills or landfill expansions in Cook County. The bill is sponsored by state Rep. Marcus Evans Jr., D-Chicago, and among its co-sponsors is state Rep. Connie Howard, D-Chicago will be heard on Tuesday by the Environmental Health Committee.

The emergency legislative action sprung up this weekend in response to a court decision released Friday in favor of the landfill. Unless the legislature acts, the landfill located at 138th Street and Cottage Grove Avenue can reopen. Latino officials from Chicago are concerned that the landfill will harm Latinos on Chicago’s southeast side by negatively impacting the urban area’s property value, economic development and the community’s ability to promote itself. In addition, the daily exposure of the smell of rotting waste has severe impacts to the respiratory health.

For decades, residents, the local community, and environmental organizations from the Lake Calumet Region have been fighting to maintain a landfill moratorium on the southeast side. This bill, HB3881, secures a landfill moratorium for Cook County and protects the state’s investments in the region.

Allowing landfills to operate in Cook County puts more than $25 million of recent taxpayer state investments at risk. The landfill moratorium guaranteed the community the ability to plan, investments and address quality of life issues. In addition, over 50 community and environmental groups are working with key legislators to help pass a ban on landfills in Chicago and Cook County.

WHO:

Rep. Marcus C. Evans, Jr.

Senator Don Harmon

Ald. John Pope, Chicago 10th Ward

Ald. Joe Moreno, Chicago 1st Ward

Ald. Rey Colon, Chicago 35th Ward

Ald. Rick Munoz, Chicago 22nd Ward

Ald. George Cardenas, Chicago 12th Ward

Peggy Salazar, Executive Director, Southeast Environmental Task Force

Juan Rangel, United Neighborhood Organization (UNO)

Riley Rodgers and Deborah Green, Trustees, Village of Dolton

Lawrence Jackson, Trustee, Village of Riverdale

WHAT: Support HB3881 to stop establishment or expansion of landfills in Cook County.

WHEN: Tuesday, May 29th at 11:15 a.m. CT

WHERE: Illinois Capital Building, First Floor

401 South 2nd Street

Springfield, IL

###

The Mayor’s office put this document together. It is informative and reasonably objective. 

Infrastructure Trust

Frequently Asked Questions: 

What is the Infrastructure Trust?

The Chicago Infrastructure Trust provides a new option to finance transformative infrastructure projects while maintaining public ownership. The infrastructure needs in the city are great and growing and we cannot afford to address only the current needs. We must find a way to invest in transformative projects that will move Chicago forward and help us build world-class infrastructure throughout the City, and that is what the Trust is for.

 

Why can’t the City Council continue funding infrastructure project the way it already does?

The nation’s infrastructure deficit, the difference between what we can afford to fix and what needs to be fixed, is growing. Chicago’s infrastructure needs are great, and growing. We cannot afford to address only the current needs. We must find a way to tackle transformative projects that will move Chicago forward and help us build world-class infrastructure throughout the City. The Trust will give us the ability to evaluate these new projects, and make sure we are getting a good, accurate read as to whether these are good for taxpayers. It is designed to take the risks associated with new projects off the back of taxpayers, who are already being tapped to fund routine capital needs of the City. The Trust is about freeing us from reliance on Springfield and Washington, DC and the shrinking funds available for infrastructure during these difficult times. The Trust will also ease the City’s existing reliance on bonds and reduce its dependency on government-issued bonds.

 

Why can’t these projects be done without the Trust? Is the Trust really necessary? The Trust is designed to either provide a better deal for taxpayers on projects than is traditionally available, or to put together projects that would not be possible without the Trust. Without the Trust, foundation money and other institutional money is difficult or impossible to attain. And the aggregation of individual projects into packages, such as the Retrofit Chicago process, makes possible transformative infrastructural projects that would never happen otherwise.

 

Why is the City Council giving over its authority to the Trust?

It is not giving over any authority to the Trust. The Aldermen will be voting on every project the City enters into with the Trust, and an Alderman will serve as a member of the Trust’s governing committee. The City Council will have full approval of any financial commitments made by the City to the Trust. This process is to set up the Trust to give the City Council an additional financing option.

 

Has this process been rushed?

For over a month, Mayor Emanuel and his team have been working directly with Aldermen to address their concerns and questions about this ordinance. Together they have made 16 improvements and clarifications with respect to transparency, openness, and ethics. The Mayor and his staff continue to work with Aldermen to clarify questions regarding the Trust. Every month we don’t address our City’s energy challenges, $1 million goes out the window.

 

Why doesn’t the Board have Aldermen on it?

It will. The Board of the Trust will consist of five voting Members appointed by the Mayor, with the approval of the City Council. One of the five voting members will be a Member of the City Council.

Additionally, there will be six non-voting advisory Board Members. Three of these will be appointed by the Mayor – commissioners, officials or employees of the City or sister agencies, and will serve ex-officio. Three others will be appointed by the voting members. The board will provide a team of industry leaders, experts, and dedicated public servants, who can help guide the Trust toward the right projects.

 

How will the Board prevent conflicts of interest for its members?

Voting members are subject to Board of Ethics rules and regulations, owe the Trust a fiduciary duty, and must recuse themselves from voting on any matter they may have a financial interest in. They will be required to provide extensive disclosure of financial interests and would be prohibited from using the Trust as a revolving door to future jobs.

Further, the Trust will require full disclosure from investors on all projects, and will make these disclosures available online. The Board members will not be compensated.

The Mayor will sign an executive order that requires an independent financial advisor, who will: 1) Conduct a full assessment of each project undertaken by the Trust, and provide a written assessment that includes (at least) a full risk assessment; a full cost analysis; a cost comparison to traditional municipal financing methods; and an economic benefit analysis for Chicago and the region, with a particular focus on job creation and retention. 2) Comply fully with ethics disclosures required of all consultants with the city, and have no financial interest of any sort in the deal. 3) Deliver said report with at least fifteen days of time for review by City Council, prior to any decisions.

 

Isn’t this another example of taking authority and decision making out of the public’s view?

No. The Trust will be required to comply with the Illinois Open Meetings Act and Freedom of Information Act. It will issue an annual report that is posted online. It will comply with the City’s procurement rules and policies, and must get City Council (or sister agency governing board) approval for all projects.

 

In addition to the previous description of the per-project assessments, the executive order will further call for an independent third party who can analyze the impact of the Trust overall, as well as its specific projects, on an annual basis. The report will include recommendations for ways to improve the Trust, will be delivered to the Mayor and the City Council and posted on the Trust’s website.

 

How is there a guarantee that investors will even be interested?

Some of the world’s largest financing institutions have sent letters of interest totaling more than $1.7 billion for potential projects. Union pension funds from around the country have inquired about the Trust, as the Trust is a win-win for them: investing their resources in a fashion that directly puts their membership to work. Additionally, foundations have expressed strong interest in the Trust, as it allows them to invest in key projects in accordance with their missions. Lots of people want to be involved with this innovative project.

 

Can you give more examples of projects that the Trust will fund?

The first project for the Trust is Retrofit Chicago, a $200 million retrofitting project for all of Chicago’s public buildings that will save more than $25 million a year in wasted energy costs. It is prudent to take this one step at a time to ensure that we can get the model right.

 

Why can’t we wait until an independent study is done?

The concept of a Trust is not new and has been discussed for years. President Obama, Republican and Democrats in Congress have all proposed similar infrastructure Trust plans. There has been extensive coverage of the policy idea nationally and globally.

 

Isn’t this just another way to privatize City assets?

All assets will remain publicly owned. The Mayor has been clear that the Trust is not about privatization of city assets, but rather, it is about building new resources that help Chicago remain competitive in the world, jobs today and jobs for the future.

 

Why can’t the Inspector General have authority and oversight over the Trust?

The IG will continue to have oversight and investigative authority over every project involving City funds or assets. Additionally, the City’s sister agencies have their own Inspectors General who will maintain oversight. The IG Ordinance is very clear about its authority over City funds and assets.

 

Why doesn’t the ordinance as written require Aldermanic approval of every project?

The Ordinance as written does already require that Aldermen approve every project that involves City assets, and City funding (both current and future).

The various sister agencies, CTA, Board of Education, Chicago Park District and CHA, were all created by State statute as independent political bodies with jurisdiction over their own functions. State statues do not give City Council any authority over those independent Agencies or Boards. The Trust ordinance does not change this. The City simply cannot by ordinance require these agencies to submit their infrastructure projects to City Council approval.

 

What, exactly, will be the roles of inspectors general who monitor various areas of city governance?

There is no further legislation needed for the Inspector General to have jurisdiction. The City’s Inspector General’s enabling ordinance (Chapter 2-56) sets out the IG’s authority very clearly. In any matter that the Trust is involved in that implicates a misuse of City funds or assets by the Trust or subsidiary, or misconduct by the Trust or subsidiary in the role of contractor to the City, the IG would have jurisdiction.

 

Would City Hall itself monitor the Infrastructure Trust’s obedience of Freedom of Information, open meetings and other transparency regulations? Or would, say, the Illinois attorney general’s office referee disputes, as it now does with the state’s FOI act?

The Administration has maintained that the FOIA and Open Meetings provisions in the Trust ordinance are enforceable through our Grant Agreements.

The City’s entry into such a Grant Agreement with the Trust becomes a binding contractual obligation of the Trust, enforceable by the City (which includes the City Council). Further, the City Council can withhold approval on Trust projects in order to force compliance with these and other transparency measures in the Grant Agreements.

The FOIA and Open Meetings provisions for the Trust are not enforceable by the State’s Attorney General.

 

Do projects done by the Trust cost us more? Municipal bonds do not always provide the best value for taxpayers. The Trust allows us to structure deals to access foundation funding or other types of funding that are not traditionally available. It is important to note that there are many factors aside from interest rates that go into the total cost of a project. So one of the key things to keep in mind is that things like cost overruns, extra supplies, etc., which in the case of most current projects is borne by the government, would actually be borne by the private sector company in these projects. Oftentimes the final costs of these projects are significantly lower over the lifecycle of that investment.

 

What are the terms of the retrofit project?

When the Trust is approved we will articulate the scope and nature of the project, present it publicly and seek financing from those banks that have expressed interest in the Trust, and get the best possible terms. There will be an effort in every project to maximize the value for the city by being strategic during the project design and negotiation phases.

 

When would a project be undertaken by the Trust, as opposed to traditional methods of financing?

If it was a transformative infrastructure project, if it had a built-in payback mechanism, and if it offered advantageous terms for the city.

Now Hiring – Laborer Apprentices

for City of Chicago Department of Water Management

 

Haas Park Soccer Clinic Launch— TOMORROW…

Fun for the kids (3-13) and a Free lunch. 

Office Manager—administrative coordinator and the daily manager of accounting, HR, and office activities.

 

Dispatch Manager—responsible for the timely pack-out of all trucks and readiness of all staging areas. Trains, supervises, and supports all drivers. The Dispatch Manager is responsible for the maintenance of the fleet, facility and equipment.

 

Manufacturing Operator—manufacturing plant. Must be able to lift 50 lbs. throughout the day and the work environment is loud, dusty and hot.

 

Account Scheduler—handles a high volume of in-bound and out-bound calls. Schedule pick-ups and delivery appts., dispatch drivers, call warehouses, carriers and drivers to ensure that orders have been picked up and delivered on time.

 

HVAC Sales—generating and following up on leads. Knowledge of HVAC is not necessary.

 

National Account Manager—Help customers move their inventory in the most cost effective way by identifying and providing logistics solutions.

 

Director of Operations for Culinary Operations—ensure that the resources are in place from a staffing, ingredient and supplies standpoint to successfully create, produce, package and deliver the meals that are served each school day.

 

These great jobs and others can be found on www.worklocal.org. Details about application can be found on this website too. 

Today, I introduced a Resolution strongly urging (because I couldn’t legally enforce) that all jobs created by a $20 million Federal Tiger Grant be used to create jobs for residents of our city.

The Ordinance and Press Release are below:

 RESOLUTION

WHEREAS, Mayor Rahm Emanuel, Federal Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and Governor Pat Quinn announced that Chicago is receiving $20 million in Tiger Grant III on December 15, 2011; and

WHEREAS, The Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) and Chicago Department of Transportation (CDOT), are sharing the $20 million grant, with the CTA receiving $16 million and CDOT $4 million; and

 

WHEREAS, The CTA will use this $16 million to eliminate the slow zone between the Logan Square L stop and the California L stop on the Blue Line to allow trains to move at 55 miles per hour instead of the current 25 miles per hour, as well as help reduce maintenance and operating costs; and

 

WHEREAS, This is part of the CTA’s broad effort to repair several miles of track to complete improvements along the Blue Line between Chicago’s Downtown Loop and O’Hare Airport; and

 

WHEREAS, CDOT will use this $4 million to expand the Chicago bike share program, which has a stated goal of offering 3,000 bikes at 300 bike stations by June 2012, and plans to expand the program to 4,000 bikes and 400 stations by 2013; and

 

WHEREAS, Both these important and welcome infrastructure improvement projects will necessitate the creation of many jobs, and take place entirely within the Chicago city limits; and

 

WHEREAS, The unemployment rate in Chicago languishes at 9.7%, and many appropriately-skilled and able Chicagoans could work on these specific projects; and

 

WHEREAS, The City of Chicago is unable to legally require that jobs created by this grant go exclusively to Chicagoans; now, therefore

BE IT RESOLVED, That we, the Mayor and the members of the City Council of the City of Chicago assembled here this 15th day of February, 2012 do hereby urge these funds be utilized by the CTA, CDOT and any other involved agency to hire qualified Chicago residents.

___________________________                       

Proco Joe Moreno                                                   

Alderman, 1^st Ward    

ALDERMAN MORENO INTRODUCES RESOLUTION CALLING FOR TIGER GRANT MONEY TO BE USED FOR CREATION OF CHICAGO JOBS

 

Chicago, IL – 1st Ward Alderman Proco Joe Moreno introduced a Resolution today, in an effort to compel those administering the recently announced $20 million in Federal Tiger Grant funds to exclusively hire qualified Chicago residents.

 

“Obviously, this $20 million is much needed and appreciated and I applaud Mayor Emanuel for attracting this funding.” Moreno said. “But, we need to make sure that the jobs created by this money go to residents of our city.”

 

Moreno initially wanted to legislate this as compulsory but discovered that legally he could not. The Illinois Department of Employment Security reported last November that Chicago-area unemployment was 9.7%.

 

“People are still hurting. Every single Ward Night people come to me asking for jobs. And while they’re debating what to cut in Washington, I’m going to do whatever I can in Chicago to help our people,” Moreno said.

 

Last December, Mayor Emanuel, Governor Quinn and Secretary of Transportation, Ray LaHood announced that this $20 million would be split between the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) and the Chicago Department of Transportation (CDOT).

 

The CTA will use its allocated $16 million to eliminate the slow zone between the Logan Square and California L stop on the Blue Line, which will enable trains to move at 55 miles per hour ( instead of the current 25 miles per hour).  CDOT will use its $4 million to expand the Chicago bike share program.

 

###                                          

Come to my community meeting, honoring six heroic police officers, TONIGHT… 6:30 p.m., at Pulaski Park Field House, 1419 W. Blackhawk

Also, a great opportunity for Pulaski Park neighbors to meet their soon-to-be Alderman, Bob Fioretti.